Republicans LIED. That's why they won. And Who's more Violent? Liberals or Conservatives?
I give a short analysis of the midterm elections. I will give more next week. Who's more Violent? Liberals or Conservatives? Conservatives of course, and I will prove it.
| Download | Duration: 00:36:51
Why The Election Turned Out As It Did:
1. The Democrats failed to deliver (public option, etc) for their supporters. This led to a low turnout and losses.
2. The GOP delivered for their supporters (obstruction,ETC) which led to a high turnout and wins.
3. Unlimited cash bought unlimited ads attacking Democrats. This onslaught of negative advertising (overwhelmingly GOP b/c of Koch Bros) excites Foxpublicans to vote and depresses Democratic supporters so they'll stay home.
Reply to this
I think this is ONE of the many money making articles for the reason of staying in afghan.
http://m.gizmodocom/5562473/massive-afghanistan-lithium-deposit-as-in-batteries-could-alter-nations-economy
Reply to this
I had serious issues with some of your history. The notion that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King because of his stance on Viet Nam strikes me as screaming for documentation. You need to back that up. And while you say "liberals" didn't kill anyone in history, if you're going all the way back to the '60s era (like with MLK) then you should acknowledge that Lee Harvey Oswald, the man who shot President Kennedy, was extremely left-wing in his politics--he was an avowedcommunist.
And if we're going back that far, it's hard not to look at the Black Panther Party, of that era, which was a violent gang of thugs who talked a good game on very leftist politics but underneath were in fact violent criminals in many cases--not everyone involved in that group was, but many were, especially Huey Newton, an avowed radical leftist and a very violent man.
That said, if we're talking recent years, it's hard for me to think of examples of serious left-wing violence in the United States. I don't count little scuffles and brawls at political events as serious, I don't count it as serious until someone's seriously wounded or maimed in a context where that was the clear intent, which is rare. It appears to me that today, in America, left-wingers are more likely to indulge in violence of the vandalism type, or, to do stupid things like idolize, apologize for, or give support to international and historical figures who were violent who they shouldn't (like the disgusting adoration of the violent, torturing, racist, homophobic murderer Che Guevara), but not to indulge in it themselves in this country. I'll give you that.
Reply to this
Once again, you're conflating Communist with liberal, Soviet with liberal, and even leftist with Liberal. In what universe were the Black panthers liberal? They advocated 2nd Amendment remedies for White violence.
Reply to this
Further for your consideration, this report issued by the Obama administration--the same agency that right-wingers had a hissy-fit over because it identified concerns over right-wing violence, around the same time gave us this report on concerns about left-wing violence:
http://theplumline.whorunsgovcom/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/hsa-leftwing-extremists-increase-in-cyber-attacks-dated-26-january-2009.pdf
They noted pretty much what I said above: it appears that left-wing violent groups and people prefer economic targets and vandalism to actually hurting people. So whether you call that "violence" is a matter of debate I suppose.
Reply to this
I'm aware of this report. read it last week when I was debating it. The thing is, I'm debating liberal versus conservative, not left versus right. there are some very hard left and violent leftists out there that I can indeed name, not in America, but I could name them.
Reply to this